Every Major AI Regulation Has One Thing in Common. Most Organizations Are Caught Flat-Footed.
Every Major AI Regulation Has One Thing in Common. Most Organizations Are Caught Flat-Footed.
AI governance has moved from best practice to legal obligation. But here is what most compliance teams are missing: the common thread across every major AI regulation is not policy documentation. It is proof.
Every regulation governing AI, data, and financial services is converging on the same three questions — asked in different language, but requiring the same answer:
- Prove what ran — not what was configured. Runtime proof.
- Prove data was protected during processing — not just at rest, not just in transit. In use.
- Prove it continuously — not once a year. Every execution.
No organization can satisfy these with SOC 2 reports, architecture diagrams, or policy documents. They need a fundamentally different kind of evidence.
What OPAQUE Does
OPAQUE is the Confidential AI infrastructure layer for enterprises processing sensitive data in AI systems. We run AI workloads inside hardware-sealed Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). Every execution produces an Attested Evidence Pack— a cryptographic receipt that proves what ran, under what policy, on what data, at what time.
That receipt is independently verifiable by any third party — a regulator, an auditor, a customer — without trusting OPAQUE or your own team.
Every other security control is a promise. Hardware attestation is proof.
You bring the app. We handle everything below it — no rebuild, no code changes.
One Artifact. Every Regulation.
The Question Every Regulator Is Going to Ask
When a regulator investigates your AI data handling, there are two possible answers.
The first: here are our policies, our architecture diagrams, and our team's written attestation. Trust us.
The second: here is a cryptographic receipt of exactly what happened, produced at the moment of execution, signed by hardware, independently verifiable by anyone. No trust required.
The regulation is not asking whether you had governance. It is asking whether you can prove governance held when it mattered.
Your rules. We enforce. Proof always delivered.